Gemini 4 Carbon: Release Date, Price and Who Can Use It
Gemini 4 Carbon was announced October 28, but most people can’t use it yet. Who has access, what it will cost, the real benchmark gap, and what to use today.

Table of contents
- Is Gemini 4 Carbon available?
- Gemini 4 Carbon release date: what can we expect?
- Can your company get early access?
- Gemini 4 Carbon price, and what it could really cost
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Argon, Opus 5.5 and GPT-6
- Why does Carbon go to cyber defenders first?
- What should you use until Carbon opens up?
- Sources
- Frequently Asked Questions
Disclosure: We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we make money.
Quick answer
Gemini 4 Carbon is Google’s newest frontier model, announced on October 28, 2026, but you probably can’t use it yet. Access starts with a subset of cyber defenders, and Google has given no public release date for developers, businesses or consumers. It isn’t in the Gemini API’s model list or price list either. For now, the Gemini 4 model you can actually use is Argon.
Gemini 4 Carbon at a glance (checked October 31, 2026)
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Announced | October 28, 2026 |
| Who has it now | A subset of cyber defenders, then more trusted partners through the Fairwind Program |
| Public release date | Not announced. Google says “as soon as possible” |
| Launch price (API) | $2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens |
| Later price (API) | $4 input, $20 output, on a date Google hasn’t given for Carbon |
| Gemini API today | Not listed in the models, pricing or changelog pages |
| Available alternative | Gemini 4 Argon, generally available since October 13 |
Is Gemini 4 Carbon available?
Not to most people. Google’s announcement says Carbon goes first to “a subset of cyber defenders,” with access phasing out to more trusted partners through its Fairwind Program. Developers, businesses and consumers come after that, “as soon as possible.”
We checked the places where a public launch would show up:
- Gemini API: Carbon isn’t on the models page, the pricing page or the changelog.
- Gemini app plans: Google’s subscriptions page lists Argon and doesn’t mention Carbon.
One source muddies this. Artificial Analysis’s Carbon page says “No publicly available API” in its charts, while its FAQ says Carbon is available through one provider. Its numbers are labelled as based on Google’s API, but the page doesn’t explain how it got access. Going by Google’s own pages, you can’t sign up and call Carbon today.
Be careful with “Carbon API” offers. Google has published no Carbon model ID or price-list entry yet. If a third-party site sells Carbon access now, ask what it’s really routing your prompts to, and remember those prompts pass through its servers. Fairwind partners also aren’t allowed to share or resell Argon access, according to the program’s page. That page doesn’t yet mention Carbon.
Gemini 4 Carbon release date: what can we expect?
Google hasn’t given one, so any exact date you see is a guess. The one useful comparison is Carbon’s older sibling:
- Argon was announced on September 30 for “trusted cyber defenders.”
- It became generally available in the API on October 13, 13 days later.
The same gap from October 28 would land around November 10. Treat that as arithmetic, not a forecast. One earlier launch can’t establish a pattern. Watch the Gemini API changelog, since that’s where Argon’s release appeared.
Can your company get early access?
Only if it fits a narrow profile. The Fairwind Program page prioritizes governments and national cyber authorities, critical infrastructure operators, and core technology platforms. Academic labs doing defensive benchmarking can also apply.
You request access through your Google Cloud account team, and Google runs background checks on applicants. The page describes these terms for Argon and doesn’t mention Carbon, so ask your account team whether joining would include it. For a typical small business or solo developer, this isn’t a realistic route.
Gemini 4 Carbon price, and what it could really cost
Google says Carbon will launch at Argon’s introductory price, with cached input tokens 95% cheaper than regular input. A later price applies after the introductory period.
| Per million tokens | Introductory | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $2 | $4 |
| Output | $10 | $20 |
| Cached input (95% off) | $0.10 | $0.20 |
Here’s what that means for a sample monthly workload of 10 million input tokens and 2 million output tokens (our example, not a typical bill):
- Introductory price: $20 + $20 = $40
- Later price: $40 + $40 = $80
- Introductory, with 8 million of the input cached: $0.80 + $4 + $20 = $24.80
Two details are easy to miss. Argon’s introductory price ends on November 30 and doubles on December 1. Carbon’s announcement gives no end date, so don’t build a budget on $2 and $10 lasting.
The other is token use. Artificial Analysis calls Carbon “very verbose,” at about 200 million output tokens on its test set against a 70 million median. A low price per token doesn’t help much if the model writes far more of them, so test your own workload once you have access.
Gemini 4 Carbon vs Argon, Opus 5.5 and GPT-6
Google says Carbon ranks first on version 5.0 of the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, with a score of 59. The leaderboard confirms that, and it’s the most useful number available because Artificial Analysis says it measures models independently.
| Model and setting | Index v5.0 | Cost per task |
|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Carbon (high) | 59 | $7.76 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (max, with fallback) | 58 | $10.04 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh, with fallback) | 57 | $6.05 |
| GPT-6 Astra (max) | 57 | $6.24 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol (max) | 55 | $1.27 |
| Gemini 4 Argon (high) | 50 | $7.68 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol (high) | 50 | $0.59 |
Source: Artificial Analysis, read October 31, 2026. The Carbon page lists $4 and $20 as its price and doesn’t say which rate the cost figure uses, so treat these costs as rough.
Our reading of this table:
- Carbon vs Opus 5.5 is close. One point separates the top settings, which is no reason to switch a working setup by itself. The Opus rows also carry a “with fallback” label that Carbon’s doesn’t, so they aren’t measured under identical conditions.
- Carbon vs Argon is the bigger story. It scores 9 points higher at nearly the same listed cost per task. If that holds at launch, Argon users on API work have a clear reason to test it.
- “#1” doesn’t mean best value. GPT-6.1 Sol at max scores 55 for $1.27 a task. If your work is high-volume, that gap in cost could matter more than 4 index points.
Compare scores only within one index version. Older articles quote different figures for the same models, including a higher score for Argon, because the index has changed.
Google’s own claims
Google’s post also reports results we can’t confirm independently:
- Security benchmarks: SEC-bench Pro 88.2% for finding vulnerabilities, ExploitGym 54.8% for exploitation, CWE-bench 71.0% for patching. Google says these were “evaluated without guardrails,” so public users may see different behavior.
- Secure code: “more than 2x uplift” over Argon in success rate, on an internal test.
- Web development: up 89 points to #4 on WebDev Arena, at 1768. So it isn’t first everywhere.
- Prompt injection: 0.0% on Gray Swan’s test, against 0.7% for Argon.
Why does Carbon go to cyber defenders first?
Google’s scores show a model that can find and exploit software flaws, not just patch them. Its post says the external security benchmarks ran without guardrails, and that it’s taking part in the US government’s voluntary pre-release testing. Our reading: letting defenders in first gives them a head start before a wider release. Google followed the same order with Argon.

What should you use until Carbon opens up?
- Gemini app users: Argon comes with Google AI Pro and Ultra, and the free plan doesn’t list it. Don’t upgrade expecting Carbon, since Google hasn’t said which plans will get it. Our Google AI Pro vs ChatGPT Plus comparison can help if you’re choosing a plan.
- API developers: use
gemini-4-argon, and budget for its price doubling on December 1. Keep the model name in one config setting so switching is easy later. - High-volume or cost-sensitive work: compare GPT-6.1 Sol first, going by the cost-per-task figures above.
- Security teams at eligible organizations: ask your Google Cloud account team about Fairwind.
- Everyone else: there’s nothing to do yet. See our GPT-6 vs Gemini 4 comparison and ChatGPT vs Claude guide for tools you can use now.
Sources
- Google: Gemini 4 Carbon announcement (October 28, 2026)
- Google: Gemini 4 Argon announcement (September 30, 2026)
- Gemini API models, pricing and changelog
- Google DeepMind: Fairwind Program
- Google: Gemini subscriptions
- Artificial Analysis: Gemini 4 Carbon and model leaderboard
Pages checked October 31, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gemini 4 Carbon free?
No free access has been announced. It’s limited to selected partners for now. Argon, the model already on sale, isn’t on the Gemini API’s free tier or listed on the Gemini app’s free plan.
Will Google AI Pro include Gemini 4 Carbon?
Google hasn’t said. Its subscriptions page lists Argon for AI Pro and Ultra and doesn’t mention Carbon yet.
What’s the difference between Gemini 4 Carbon and Argon?
Carbon is the newer model and scores 59 on Artificial Analysis’s Intelligence Index, against 50 for Argon at the high setting. Argon is generally available now, while Carbon is restricted. Both have the same announced API prices.
Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than Claude Opus 5.5?
On Artificial Analysis’s index it’s one point ahead, 59 to 58, which is close. That’s one benchmark, and most people can’t test Carbon yet, so it’s too early to call it better for real work.


